Department of Labor Seal photos representing the workforce - digital imagery? copyright 2001 photodisc, inc.
Department of Labor Seal www.osha.gov  [skip navigational links] Search    Advanced Search | A-Z Index
Standard Interpretations
07/25/1991 - The term "wheel chocks" and whether the employment of one chock would satisfy the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents
• Standard Number: 1910.178(k)(1)

July 25, 1991

Mr. William A. Guyer
Marketing Manager
Kelly Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 09993
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209-0993

Dear Mr. Guyer:

This is in further response to your letter of April 25, to Assistant Secretary Gerard F. Scannell, concerning clarification of the term "wheel chocks" and whether the employment of one chock would satisfy the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

You were correct in your assumption that the word, "chocks" as it appears in the OSHA standard 29 CFR 1910.178(k)(l) is a grammatical construction only, and does not mean that OSHA would require the placing of multiple chocks under the conditions you have previously described, should fully satisfy the intent of the safety regulation if it effectively prevents movement of the truck during loading operations involving powered industrial trucks. Because of the above interpretation, your customer's application for a variance would not be necessary.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has a longstanding policy against approval of any product, and this letter may not be used as evidence of direct or indirect endorsement of your product by OSHA.

In addition to the above, we are concerned about apparent hazards in the Kelley System which appear to us to be evident from an examination of the pamphlet describing details of your system. The apparent hazards are listed, as follows:

1. The system is hydraulic in nature. Any leak or rupture in the piping which carries the liquid could result in a truck not actually being chocked against movement. Potential users should be cautioned to inspect for these hazards before each use.

2. The design of the chock and the track in which it sets, calls for accurate "spotting" of the trailer wheels along the track line. This would also be a responsibility of the eventual user of the product.

3. The push button control panel relies in part on red and green lights. Thus there is a remote possibility that the activation of the chocks could be misread by a truck driver or his helper if one happened to be color blind.

Please do not hesitate to contact this office if we can be of additional assistance.

Sincerely,



Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs


Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents



Back to Top Back to Top  http://www.osha.gov/index.html http://www.dol.gov/

Contact Us | Freedom of Information Act | Customer Survey
Privacy and Security Statement | Disclaimers
Occupational Safety & Health Administration
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210